…that might just be a deeply rooted thing about how humans and governance--how the religious luck of the king affects prosperity, and bad luck (i.e. drought, disease, bad harvests) are attributable directly to the king, even if there's no demonstrable chain of cause and effect and agency.
I'm inclined to agree. I mean, it seems silly to me that people expect the president to help the economy even though, to my knowledge, nobody can predict the effects of economic interventions meaningfully better than chance. It is as if the public believes in some caricature of the Protestant work ethic dictating that the president can solve any national problem so long as he works hard enough and his heart is in the right place.
---
Brandon: "I had casual sex this weekend." Alex: "I had sex too, with someone I love who accepts and loves me." Kodi: "I cleaned up my .emacs."