This manual describes Artiruno version 0.4.1.
Artiruno is a Python package for performing verbal decision analysis (VDA) in the manner of ZAPROS (Larichev & Moshkovich, 1995) and UniComBOS (Ashikhmin & Furems, 2005). VDA is a class of decision-support software for multiple-criteria decision-making that doesn't ask the user for explicit preference functions or criterion weights. Instead, the user is asked questions such as "Which of these two items would you prefer?". VDA doesn't always produce a total order for the alternatives, but the weaker assumptions made about what people are capable of accurately judging helps to ensure that results aren't contaminated by arbitrary choices of numbers and functions.
Artiruno has a web interface and a terminal-based interface. It can also be used programmatically. To install the latest release from PyPI, use the command pip3 install artiruno
. You'll need Python 3.8 or greater. You can then start an interactive VDA session with python3 -m artiruno FILENAME
; say python3 -m artiruno --help
to see the available command-line options.
Artiruno input files are formatted in JSON. See the examples
directory of the source code for examples, and artiruno.avda()
below for a description of the arguments.
Artiruno has an automated test suite that uses pytest. To run it, install the PyPI packages pytest
and pytest-asyncio
and then use the command pytest
. To run it on a web browser with Pyodide, use the script pyodide_testing.py
. By default, regardless of platform, particularly slow tests are skipped; say pytest --slow
to run all the tests.
The documentation uses Sphinx. To build it, say sphinx-build -b html doc/ doc/_build/
.
Given a set of alternatives and a set of criteria on which the alternatives can be rated, Artiruno can try to find the best single alternative or the best n
alternatives, or it can try to rank all the alternatives. Here are the basic assumptions that Artiruno makes about the decision-making scenario:
Location
, with levels ["Far", "Some distance", "Almost ideal"]
, which means that Some distance
is preferred to Far
.a ≤ b
means that item a
is worse than or equally as good as item b
. Specifically, your preferences are an eventually total preorder, meaning that:
a
, b
, and c
, a ≤ b
and b ≤ c
, then a ≤ c
.a
and b
, exactly one of a < b
, a > b
, or a ≈ b
must be true (with the last relation meaning indifference or equivalence: a ≤ b
and a ≥ b
and yet a ≠ b
). However, Artiruno's knowledge of your preferences is in general incomplete, and its ignorance of the relation between a pair of items a
and b
is represented as incomparability. This is the sense in which the totality is only eventual.a
is strictly worse than b
on one criterion, and no better than b
on all other criteria, then a < b
.p
and subset of the criteria S
, let dev_from_ref(S, p)
be the item that has the best value on all criteria except possibly the criteria in S
, for which it has the criterion values of p
. In other words, dev_from_ref(S, p)
deviates from the reference item—the best possible item—only on S
, and values for these criteria come from p
. Then let a
and b
be distinct items and {A[1], A[2], …, A[n]}
and {B[1], B[2], …, B[n]}
be partitions of the criteria. If dev_from_ref(A[i], a) ≤ dev_from_ref(B[i], b)
for all i
, and at least one of these inequalities is strict, then a < b
; if none of the inequalities are strict, then a ≈ b
instead.At a high level, the way Artiruno works is by applying transitivity and dominance to make as many inferences as it can, and then asking you questions about hypothetical items (generated by dev_from_ref
) in order to apply segmentwise dominance and narrow things down. Artiruno will try to ask as few questions as possible in order to reach the goal you requested (e.g., finding the best item among a set of alternatives), and it will try to ask simpler questions (with hypothetical items that minimally deviate from the reference item) before more complex ones.
Once the goal has been achieved, or Artiruno can't find any more useful questions to ask, Artiruno will return the inferred preferences. In interactive mode, the top-n
subset of your preferences (as defined by artiruno.PreorderedSet.extreme()
) will be shown if requested, and your preferences will be displayed as a graph with GraphViz if the corresponding Python package is available. (Graphs are not currently implemented for the web interface.)
criteria
, alts=None
, asker=None
, find_best=None
, max_dev=2
, allowed_pairs_callback=<function <lambda>>
)Conduct verbal decision analysis.
alts
is None
, we use the entire item space; that is, the set of all possible items.f(a, b)
that returns a Relation
(other than IC
) for a
and b
; greater elements represent greater preference. Use vda()
if the asker is synchronous and avda()
if it's asynchronous.find_best
items and stop there. Otherwise, Artiruno will try to compare all the alternatives.max_dev = 5
allows 4 deviant criteria compared to 1 deviant criterion, or 3 compared to 2.allowed_pairs
for each iteration of the outermost loop.A PreorderedSet
. Its elements will be a subset of the item space and a superset of alts
.
async
artiruno.avda(criteria
, alts=None
, asker=None
, find_best=None
, max_dev=2
, allowed_pairs_callback=<function <lambda>>
)As vda()
, but accepts an asynchronous asker
.
class
artiruno.PreorderedSet(elements=()
, relations=()
, raw_relations=None
)A set equipped with a preorder. Elements can be added to the set, and the order can be updated to make previously incomparable elements comparable.
(a, b, rel)
, where a
and b
are objects in elements
, and rel
is a Relation
. By default, all elements are incomparable to each other.x
)Add x
to the set; a no-op if it's already there. x
is initially incomparable to all other elements.
a
, b
)Return the Relation
between a
and b
.
Return a copy of the object.
n
, among=None
, bottom=False
)Return the top-n
subset (or bottom-n
subset, if bottom
is true) of the items in the set among
, or of the whole set if among
is not provided.
We define the top-n subset of a preordered set S
to be the set of all elements x ∈ S
such that
x
is comparable to all elements of S
, andn - 1
distinct elements a ∈ S
such that a > x
.We define the bottom-n
subset similarly, with the inequality in the other direction. Notice that the top-n
subset may contain more or less than n
items.
elements
)Return a new PreorderedSet
that contains only the requested elements
.
namer=<class 'str'>
)Return the set represented as a graphviz.Source
object. Requires the Python package graphviz
. namer
should be a callback that returns a name for an element, as a string.
a
, b
, rel
)Update the ordering such that a
and b
are related by rel
, a Relation
other than IC
. Any other relations that can be inferred by transitivity will be added to the set.
Return a list of pairs that were actually updated. If the relation between a
and b
was already known, the list will be empty. If we made inferences for other pairs, these pairs will be included in the list.
Raise ContradictionError
if the new relation isn't consistent with the preexisting relations (other than incomparability).
among=None
)Return all the maxima among the items in among
, or the whole set if among
is not provided. The maxima are defined as the top-1 subset, per extreme()
.
among=None
)As maxes
, but for minima.
namer=<class 'str'>
)Describe all the relations with a string like "A<B C<D E=F". namer
should be a callback that returns a name for an element, as a string.
exception
artiruno.ContradictionError(k
, was
, claimed
)Represents an attempt to build an inconsistent order.
class
artiruno.Relation(value
)An enum.Enum
representing the order relation between two objects.
= 0
Equal or equivalent to
= 1
Greater than
= None
Incomparable (true relation not yet known)
= -1
Less than
classmethod
cmp(a
, b
)Return the Relation
between a
and b
corresponding to Python's built-in comparison operators.
x
)Shortcut for itertools.combinations(x, 2)
.
a
, b
)As Python 2's cmp()
.
Ashikhmin, I., & Furems, E. (2005). UniComBOS—Intelligent decision support system for multi-criteria comparison and choice. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 13, 147–157. doi:10.1002/mcda.380
Larichev, O. I., & Moshkovich, H. M. (1995). ZAPROS-LM—A method and system for ordering multiattribute alternatives. European Journal of Operational Research, 82, 503–521. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(93)E0143-L